Venture funding by city — startup hubs & rising metros

400 metros · ranked by total capital. Momentum compares the last 12 months of capital against the prior 12 to surface rising and cooling hubs.

City	Region	Companies	Rounds	Capital	Momentum · 12mo
SAN FRANCISCO	WA, USA; San Francisco, CA, USA; Remote	3,065	5,726	$186.4B	Cooling-62%
NEW YORK	WA, USA; New York, NY, USA; Remote	6,050	10,449	$184.6B	Cooling-39%
BOSTON	MA, USA; Remote	1,013	2,176	$44.5B	Cooling-40%
New York	NY, USA; Washington, DC, USA	1,068	1,297	$39.7B	Cooling-92%
AUSTIN	TX, USA; Remote	1,490	2,789	$29.3B	Cooling-56%
CHICAGO	NH, Netherlands	1,412	2,487	$28.9B	Cooling-79%
LOS ANGELES	CA, USA; Remote	1,160	1,789	$27.7B	Cooling-77%
CAMBRIDGE	MA, USA	629	1,347	$24.7B	Cooling-80%
SAN DIEGO	NY, USA; Remote	917	2,035	$23.4B	Cooling-28%
HOUSTON	TX, USA	794	1,317	$22.5B	Cooling-44%
San Francisco	WA, USA; San Francisco, CA, USA	2,746	952	$21.4B	Cooling-55%
SEATTLE	WA, USA; Remote	1,347	2,800	$21.3B	Cooling-26%
DALLAS	CA, USA; LA, Nigeria; Remote	979	1,448	$18.2B	Cooling-84%
ATLANTA	NY, USA	772	1,353	$17.6B	Cooling-80%
PALO ALTO	TN, India	543	1,002	$17.6B	Steady+1%
DENVER	MD, USA; Remote	924	1,827	$17.3B	Cooling-56%
SAN JOSE	Latvia	402	827	$13.6B	Steady+15%
MOUNTAIN VIEW	India; Remote	299	655	$12.8B	Cooling-90%
MENLO PARK	CA, USA; Remote	255	525	$12.2B	Cooling-97%
FORT WORTH	—	161	256	$12.1B	Cooling-78%
REDWOOD CITY	NY, USA	204	543	$11.8B	Cooling-81%
LONDON	United Kingdom	270	458	$11.6B	Cooling-42%
WILMINGTON	HI, USA; Remote	444	704	$11.5B	Rising+159%
WALTHAM	—	410	689	$11.0B	Cooling-69%
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO	CA, USA	135	310	$10.8B	Cooling-69%
SAN MATEO	Telangana, India	255	579	$10.7B	Cooling-72%
MIAMI	Valle del Cauca, Colombia	525	915	$10.2B	Cooling-33%
WASHINGTON	LA, Nigeria; LA, Nigeria	446	768	$10.2B	Rising+184%
IRVINE	—	399	925	$10.2B	Cooling-89%
BOCA RATON	—	258	485	$9.8B	Cooling-66%
HAWTHORNE	—	21	43	$9.5B	Cooling-100%
Boston	MA, USA; Santa Fe, NM, USA	249	513	$9.5B	Steady-8%
SANTA MONICA	CA, USA; Remote	350	594	$9.4B	Cooling-81%
DURHAM	NC, USA	228	610	$9.0B	Cooling-87%
SHERIDAN	—	141	161	$9.0B	Rising+102%
VANCOUVER	Singapore; Remote	1,175	3,080	$8.9B	Cooling-32%
SANTA CLARA	—	231	531	$8.7B	Cooling-84%
COLUMBIA	—	140	215	$8.4B	Cooling-42%
GRAND CAYMAN	SP, Brazil	166	298	$8.3B	Cooling-23%
TORONTO	ON, Canada	640	1,362	$8.3B	Cooling-45%
BEVERLY HILLS	—	188	284	$8.3B	Cooling-97%
SUNNYVALE	—	229	513	$7.5B	Cooling-83%
CHARLOTTE	—	280	404	$7.3B	Cooling-99%
SCOTTSDALE	NY, USA	606	1,067	$7.0B	Cooling-68%
BOULDER	—	443	1,048	$6.9B	Cooling-54%
BROOKLYN	Xique-xique, Brazil	679	1,006	$6.9B	Cooling-58%
NASHVILLE	CA, USA	440	680	$6.9B	Cooling-78%
San Diego	CA, USA; Urbana, IL, USA	133	395	$6.8B	Rising+95%
SAN ANTONIO	—	191	347	$6.6B	Cooling-94%
FREMONT	—	182	430	$6.6B	Cooling-88%
EMERYVILLE	CA, USA	83	254	$6.4B	Cooling-50%
LAS VEGAS	NV, USA	566	826	$6.4B	Cooling-88%
PORTLAND	OR, USA	617	1,174	$6.2B	Cooling-80%
BIRMINGHAM	TX, USA	276	434	$6.1B	Cooling-98%
Los Angeles	CA, USA; Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden	258	291	$6.0B	Rising+628%
SINGAPORE	Singapore	49	88	$5.8B	Steady+5%
Palo Alto	CA, USA; Sunnyvale, CA, USA	175	231	$5.8B	Rising+254%
HAMILTON	—	44	78	$5.7B	Rising+28%
ST. LOUIS	—	177	329	$5.7B	Cooling-85%
MINNEAPOLIS	—	277	521	$5.6B	Cooling-79%
INGLEWOOD	—	23	49	$5.5B	Cooling-100%
PITTSBURGH	PA, USA; Austin, TX, USA	413	923	$5.3B	Steady-4%
South San Francisco	CA, USA	34	104	$5.2B	Cooling-100%
Philadelphia	PA, USA; Remote	58	112	$5.1B	Cooling-99%
BELLEVUE	—	279	606	$5.0B	Cooling-82%
SALT LAKE CITY	UT, USA	274	547	$5.0B	Cooling-92%
LUXEMBOURG	—	28	47	$5.0B	Cooling-72%
DOVER	Stockholm County, Sweden	280	353	$5.0B	Rising+239%
Grand Cayman	GA, USA	29	61	$4.9B	Cooling-63%
Menlo Park	NY, USA	63	98	$4.8B	Rising+391%
Las Vegas	NV, USA; Remote	73	116	$4.8B	Rising+3142%
KNOXVILLE	—	79	128	$4.8B	Rising+2268%
ANAHEIM	CA, USA; Remote	34	56	$4.6B	Cooling-100%
OAKLAND	LA, Nigeria	257	439	$4.5B	Cooling-90%
GREENWICH	—	148	185	$4.4B	Cooling-92%
Irvine	CA, USA; Irvine, CA, USA	72	177	$4.4B	Rising+157%
WASHINGTON, D.C.	—	5	13	$4.4B	—
KIRKLAND	—	141	323	$4.3B	Cooling-95%
PHILADELPHIA	—	300	534	$4.3B	Rising+124%
INDIANAPOLIS	—	370	699	$4.2B	Rising+238%
COLUMBUS	OH, USA	224	396	$4.1B	Steady+11%
San Jose	CA, USA; San Francisco, CA, USA	99	186	$4.1B	Rising+64%
Austin	TX, USA; South Bend, IN, USA	240	510	$4.1B	Cooling-95%
VENICE	—	85	153	$4.1B	Cooling-54%
TUCSON	—	154	277	$4.1B	Cooling-100%
JACKSONVILLE	—	103	189	$4.0B	Cooling-84%
Houston	TX, USA	123	231	$4.0B	Cooling-92%
BERKELEY	CA, USA; Berkeley, CA, USA	179	332	$4.0B	Cooling-63%
ARLINGTON	—	182	349	$3.9B	Steady-8%
CLEVELAND	—	166	302	$3.8B	Cooling-44%
BALTIMORE	—	259	521	$3.7B	Cooling-86%
Chicago	IL, USA; Remote	154	289	$3.7B	Steady-13%
Sunnyvale	CA, USA; Remote	51	95	$3.6B	Rising+429026%
Miami	SP, Brazil	95	176	$3.6B	Cooling-35%
TEL-AVIV	—	8	11	$3.5B	—
OVERLAND PARK	—	77	119	$3.5B	Cooling-97%
DUBLIN	County Dublin, Ireland	63	136	$3.5B	Cooling-93%
CULVER CITY	CA, USA	88	186	$3.4B	Rising+20%
Wilmington	Scotland, United Kingdom	68	133	$3.3B	Cooling-82%
MONTREAL	—	85	146	$3.3B	Cooling-68%
TAMPA	—	293	540	$3.2B	Cooling-89%
Mountain View	CA, USA; San Francisco, CA, USA	119	165	$3.2B	Steady+4%
RALEIGH	—	319	626	$3.2B	Cooling-46%
McLean	VA, USA; Remote	27	60	$3.1B	Steady+2%
Lexington	—	18	55	$3.1B	Cooling-99%
BETHESDA	—	150	298	$3.1B	Cooling-71%
NEWPORT BEACH	—	168	252	$3.1B	Rising+504%
Waltham	—	44	140	$3.1B	Cooling-61%
WATERTOWN	—	46	109	$3.1B	Cooling-97%
WOBURN	—	76	225	$3.1B	Rising+30%
Atlanta	GA, USA; Remote	125	224	$3.0B	Rising+1346%
Denver	CO, USA; Cambridge, MA, USA	127	324	$3.0B	Cooling-89%
Midland	—	5	5	$3.0B	—
PHOENIX	NY, USA	325	492	$3.0B	Cooling-93%
MILPITAS	—	54	142	$2.9B	Cooling-85%
LEXINGTON	CA, USA; Cambridge, MA, USA; Remote	195	393	$2.9B	Steady-4%
FOSTER CITY	CA, USA	53	99	$2.9B	Cooling-58%
TORTOLA	CA, USA	28	29	$2.9B	Cooling-100%
CARLSBAD	CA, USA; Remote	160	340	$2.9B	Cooling-60%
BURLINGTON	VT, USA	726	871	$2.9B	Cooling-58%
HAYWARD	CA, USA	39	94	$2.9B	Cooling-99%
PLANO	—	223	313	$2.9B	Rising+343%
BURLINGAME	CA, USA; Burlingame, CA, USA; Remote	81	152	$2.9B	Cooling-100%
LANGLEY	—	10	49	$2.9B	Cooling-67%
Louisville	NY, USA; Remote	34	74	$2.8B	Rising+3315%
Washington	DC, USA; San Francisco, CA, USA; Remote	63	126	$2.8B	Cooling-75%
LOUISVILLE	CO, USA	473	482	$2.8B	Cooling-28%
Redwood City	CA, USA; Remote	66	144	$2.8B	Cooling-100%
St. Louis	MO, USA; Remote	30	62	$2.8B	Rising+577%
Thousand Oaks	—	4	8	$2.8B	—
EL SEGUNDO	—	85	173	$2.8B	Steady-7%
MORRISVILLE	—	60	174	$2.8B	Cooling-95%
Cambridge	MA, USA; Remote	119	222	$2.7B	Cooling-100%
BOZEMAN	—	60	114	$2.7B	Rising+1019%
LEHI	UT, USA	99	174	$2.7B	Cooling-95%
Brooklyn	NY, USA; New York, NY, USA; Remote	93	207	$2.7B	Cooling-75%
ORLANDO	FL, USA; New York, NY, USA; Remote	201	319	$2.6B	Cooling-81%
Berkeley	CA, USA; San Francisco, CA, USA; Remote	39	52	$2.6B	Rising+8675%
LONG BEACH	CA, USA	64	110	$2.6B	Cooling-46%
LA JOLLA	—	117	238	$2.6B	Cooling-43%
ST LOUIS	—	17	32	$2.6B	—
HONOLULU	HI, USA; Remote	106	199	$2.6B	Rising+341%
ALAMEDA	CA, USA	45	103	$2.6B	Rising+58%
DES MOINES	CA, USA	83	137	$2.5B	Rising+125%
CAMPBELL	—	72	160	$2.5B	Rising+160%
CINCINNATI	MI, USA	228	397	$2.5B	Cooling-69%
Santa Clara	CA, USA; Sunnyvale, CA, USA	55	148	$2.4B	Cooling-100%
RICHMOND	CA, USA	219	394	$2.4B	Steady-4%
KANSAS CITY	—	104	168	$2.4B	Cooling-98%
San Mateo	CA, USA; Remote	79	136	$2.4B	Cooling-76%
Santa Monica	CA, USA; Remote	65	131	$2.4B	Cooling-46%
STAMFORD	—	131	251	$2.4B	Rising+694%
RESTON	—	89	197	$2.4B	Cooling-100%
ROCKVILLE	—	120	275	$2.3B	Rising+1545%
ALEXANDRIA	CA, USA	78	132	$2.3B	Cooling-74%
MADISON	—	210	422	$2.3B	Cooling-91%
SPRINGFIELD	—	46	67	$2.3B	Rising+27%
NEWTON	—	96	206	$2.3B	Cooling-99%
El Segundo	CA, USA	28	69	$2.3B	Cooling-33%
LITTLE ROCK	—	136	178	$2.2B	Cooling-39%
Seattle	WA, USA; San Francisco, CA, USA	186	333	$2.2B	Cooling-88%
WESTPORT	—	84	121	$2.2B	Cooling-94%
Troy	MI, USA; Remote	8	14	$2.2B	Rising+190%
The Woodlands	—	14	25	$2.1B	New
SAN RAMON	—	55	140	$2.1B	Cooling-85%
MCLEAN	—	102	227	$2.1B	Steady-17%
DOWNERS GROVE	—	17	27	$2.1B	Cooling-99%
CHARLOTTESVILLE	CA, USA	125	280	$2.1B	Cooling-95%
PLEASANTON	—	79	154	$2.1B	Cooling-25%
MOUNT KISCO	—	10	20	$2.0B	Cooling-100%
BEDFORD	—	73	176	$2.0B	Cooling-99%
FAIRFAX	—	40	74	$2.0B	Cooling-79%
ST. HELIER	—	8	10	$2.0B	—
RENO	—	147	353	$1.9B	Cooling-72%
TACOMA	—	32	55	$1.9B	Cooling-100%
HAUPPAUGE	—	21	43	$1.9B	Cooling-100%
REDMOND	—	128	237	$1.9B	Cooling-81%
Brentwood	Brentwood, United Kingdom	25	46	$1.9B	—
THE WOODLANDS	—	66	110	$1.8B	Rising+1333%
PRINCETON	—	87	173	$1.8B	Rising+1007%
NEW HAVEN	—	79	154	$1.8B	Steady+10%
NEWARK	England, United Kingdom	120	199	$1.8B	Steady-10%
London	United Kingdom; United Kingdom	668	74	$1.8B	Cooling-98%
WALPOLE	—	8	25	$1.8B	Rising+41%
GAITHERSBURG	—	56	123	$1.7B	Cooling-64%
Milpitas	CA, USA	15	53	$1.7B	Cooling-100%
GREENWOOD VILLAGE	—	115	233	$1.7B	Cooling-59%
SANTA BARBARA	CA, USA	174	363	$1.7B	Cooling-64%
SOMERVILLE	—	93	152	$1.7B	Cooling-77%
WICHITA	TX, USA; San Francisco, CA, USA; Remote	65	96	$1.7B	Cooling-88%
SOUTH BURLINGTON	—	10	36	$1.7B	Cooling-100%
ENGLEWOOD	—	90	171	$1.7B	Rising+264%
MEMPHIS	MN, USA; New York, NY, USA; Austin, TX, USA; Remote	121	190	$1.7B	Cooling-97%
WAYNE	—	63	131	$1.6B	Cooling-96%
SAN LEANDRO	—	21	39	$1.6B	—
Omaha	NE, USA; Remote	16	40	$1.6B	Cooling-29%
READING	—	17	21	$1.6B	Cooling-100%
WESTBOROUGH	—	32	71	$1.6B	Cooling-86%
Foster City	CA, USA	17	46	$1.6B	—
CARMEL	DL, India	90	157	$1.6B	Rising+1693%
GILBERT	—	40	75	$1.6B	Steady+18%
JOHANNESBURG	—	4	5	$1.6B	—
Vancouver	Canada	135	360	$1.6B	Rising+148%
ANDOVER	—	46	99	$1.5B	Cooling-100%
ELKHART	—	6	7	$1.5B	New
FRESNO	—	11	14	$1.5B	Rising+723%
Plano	—	38	94	$1.5B	Cooling-100%
ANN ARBOR	—	156	312	$1.5B	Cooling-63%
RICHARDSON	—	62	126	$1.5B	Cooling-85%
HARTFORD	—	19	24	$1.5B	—
Dallas	TX, USA; Remote	82	154	$1.5B	Cooling-60%
Watertown	MA, USA	15	43	$1.5B	Cooling-100%
TULSA	—	81	116	$1.5B	Cooling-86%
BURBANK	—	129	173	$1.4B	Cooling-69%
Raleigh	NC, USA; Remote	39	91	$1.4B	Cooling-100%
Broomfield	—	15	38	$1.4B	Cooling-100%
ROCHESTER	CA, USA	113	219	$1.4B	Cooling-95%
SOMERSET	—	14	41	$1.4B	Cooling-100%
PASADENA	—	132	216	$1.4B	Cooling-87%
BROOMFIELD	—	54	128	$1.4B	Rising+411%
Southfield	MI, USA	4	5	$1.4B	—
Waterbury	—	3	13	$1.4B	Cooling-100%
SYDNEY	—	21	29	$1.4B	Steady-12%
JERSEY CITY	—	67	126	$1.4B	Cooling-97%
BRENTWOOD	—	96	185	$1.3B	Cooling-81%
TEMPE	—	90	178	$1.3B	Cooling-98%
FRISCO	—	83	137	$1.3B	Cooling-95%
Yardley	—	3	12	$1.3B	—
GOLETA	—	35	132	$1.3B	Cooling-100%
Campbell	—	29	105	$1.3B	Cooling-64%
AMSTERDAM	—	9	17	$1.3B	Cooling-100%
SAN CARLOS	CA, USA	74	140	$1.3B	Steady-9%
ALISO VIEJO	—	46	122	$1.3B	Cooling-67%
ALDEN	—	15	18	$1.3B	New
LAKE FOREST	—	58	99	$1.3B	Cooling-100%
CARSON CITY	—	31	42	$1.3B	New
PURCHASE	—	13	28	$1.3B	—
BOTHELL	UT, USA	52	102	$1.2B	Steady-1%
ALPHARETTA	—	135	214	$1.2B	Steady-18%
PROVIDENCE	NY, USA; Providence, RI, USA; Remote	83	148	$1.2B	Cooling-98%
MILWAUKEE	CA, USA	108	170	$1.2B	Rising+148%
LITTLETON	—	93	140	$1.2B	Rising+45%
SANTA CRUZ	—	40	83	$1.2B	Cooling-100%
ZIONSVILLE	—	8	16	$1.2B	—
Southlake	—	9	11	$1.2B	Cooling-99%
Pleasanton	CA, USA; Remote	20	74	$1.2B	—
Boulder	CO, USA; San Francisco, CA, USA; Remote	76	185	$1.2B	Steady+0%
CORAL GABLES	—	64	73	$1.2B	Cooling-92%
CONSHOHOCKEN	—	45	69	$1.2B	Cooling-100%
FULTON	—	9	19	$1.2B	—
Toronto	ON, Canada; Remote	184	243	$1.2B	Cooling-74%
Herndon	—	9	20	$1.2B	—
Manchester	Manchester, United Kingdom	46	18	$1.2B	Cooling-50%
Boca Raton	—	27	87	$1.2B	Steady-1%
BRISBANE	—	24	55	$1.2B	Cooling-100%
Ponte Vedra	—	4	9	$1.2B	New
PLYMOUTH MEETING	—	15	46	$1.2B	Cooling-100%
Stamford	—	26	76	$1.2B	Rising+341%
HOBOKEN	—	30	48	$1.2B	Cooling-100%
Orlando	FL, USA	32	98	$1.1B	Cooling-100%
WEST HOLLYWOOD	CA, USA	78	122	$1.1B	Cooling-90%
TORRANCE	—	35	90	$1.1B	Rising+78%
ROUND ROCK	—	37	61	$1.1B	Cooling-100%
FRANKLIN	CA, USA	113	171	$1.1B	Cooling-98%
San Carlos	CA, USA; Remote	27	54	$1.1B	Cooling-100%
WOODLAND HILLS	—	186	245	$1.1B	Cooling-99%
FRAMINGHAM	—	35	88	$1.1B	—
Hamilton	Canada	11	10	$1.1B	Cooling-100%
MALVERN	—	43	143	$1.1B	Cooling-87%
FORT LAUDERDALE	England, United Kingdom; Remote	116	238	$1.1B	Cooling-96%
MCKINNEY	CA, USA	40	60	$1.1B	Cooling-69%
FORT COLLINS	—	50	103	$1.1B	Cooling-94%
HERNDON	—	46	112	$1.1B	Rising+685%
BROOKFIELD	—	16	59	$1.1B	Cooling-100%
TEANECK	—	26	33	$1.1B	—
CRANFORD	—	15	22	$1.1B	—
Charlotte	NC, USA; Remote	62	97	$1.1B	Cooling-100%
LOS ALTOS	—	94	171	$1.1B	Cooling-45%
HUNTINGTON BEACH	ON, Canada; Remote	41	49	$1.1B	Cooling-24%
Nashville	TN, USA; Remote	65	113	$1.1B	Cooling-98%
CALGARY	Haifa District, Israel	154	297	$1.1B	Cooling-78%
RADNOR	—	56	86	$1.1B	Cooling-70%
Santa Ana	—	8	21	$1.1B	—
IRVING	—	73	93	$1.1B	Cooling-52%
Carlsbad	CA, USA	32	99	$1.1B	Cooling-92%
North Las Vegas	—	3	16	$1.0B	—
Minneapolis	MN, USA; Remote	81	162	$1.0B	Steady-18%
Emeryville	CA, USA	15	36	$1.0B	Rising+43%
CHARLESTON	—	101	192	$1.0B	Rising+266%
DEERFIELD	—	22	32	$1.0B	—
La Jolla	—	11	21	$1.0B	—
CHAPEL HILL	—	76	136	$1.0B	Cooling-92%
Salt Lake City	UT, USA; Remote	41	103	$1.0B	Cooling-100%
SOUTHLAKE	—	86	162	$1.0B	Rising+798%
NATICK	—	51	115	$998.7M	Rising+60%
SKOKIE	—	24	53	$998.4M	Cooling-100%
PFLUGERVILLE	—	7	18	$997.5M	Cooling-100%
SACRAMENTO	CA, USA	99	144	$995.1M	Cooling-52%
Baltimore	MD, USA	24	46	$989.8M	Cooling-47%
WILTON	—	22	27	$986.8M	New
WESTLAKE VILLAGE	—	44	93	$977.7M	Cooling-95%
WEST PALM BEACH	—	80	158	$972.1M	Cooling-94%
SOUTH JORDAN	CA, USA	35	83	$969.4M	Cooling-100%
OMAHA	CA, USA; Remote	112	168	$968.0M	Cooling-99%
GERMANTOWN	—	31	67	$965.6M	Cooling-100%
OKLAHOMA CITY	—	124	179	$955.2M	Cooling-24%
BUFFALO	—	116	156	$955.1M	Cooling-75%
VAN BUREN TOWNSHIP	—	3	3	$952.5M	Cooling-100%
LAFAYETTE	—	81	116	$945.6M	Cooling-99%
Torrance	—	12	36	$942.5M	Cooling-100%
AKRON	—	44	56	$941.6M	Cooling-100%
Pittsburgh	PA, USA; San Francisco, CA, USA; Remote	57	161	$936.9M	Rising+485%
Culver City	CA, USA	19	57	$932.2M	Cooling-100%
GREENVILLE	—	123	255	$912.7M	Rising+120%
MILL VALLEY	—	50	93	$912.3M	Cooling-100%
CUPERTINO	Denmark	76	134	$911.6M	Rising+2300%
MORRISTOWN	—	22	56	$909.4M	Cooling-100%
MIDLAND	—	23	23	$907.5M	Cooling-100%
Fort Lauderdale	—	24	50	$905.8M	Cooling-96%
NEW CANAAN	—	38	70	$905.4M	Cooling-97%
EDEN PRAIRIE	—	54	132	$905.1M	Cooling-100%
CARY	NC, USA; Remote	74	114	$902.8M	Cooling-89%
Greenwood Village	—	14	52	$902.5M	—
ALHAMBRA	—	9	19	$901.6M	New
LEWES	Bogota, Colombia; Remote	83	105	$901.1M	Cooling-90%
COLORADO SPRINGS	—	119	170	$893.9M	Cooling-71%
SARASOTA	—	91	145	$893.6M	Cooling-71%
MIAMI BEACH	—	93	148	$891.3M	Cooling-91%
Irving	Canada	16	68	$884.2M	Cooling-100%
GARDENA	—	10	16	$883.9M	Cooling-100%
KENNETT SQUARE	—	7	10	$882.1M	—
Oakland	CA, USA; Remote	61	77	$879.8M	Cooling-100%
WINTER PARK	—	46	58	$876.1M	Rising+612%
STOCKHOLM	—	12	17	$874.3M	—
ST. PAUL	—	49	106	$873.3M	Rising+227%
Glendale	—	7	14	$872.0M	—
NIAGARA FALLS	—	4	10	$870.1M	New
Exton	—	3	12	$864.4M	Cooling-100%
QUINCY	—	29	55	$862.2M	Rising+527%
WELLESLEY	—	54	110	$857.4M	Cooling-100%
LINCOLN	NY, USA	76	140	$850.1M	Cooling-94%
WARRENVILLE	—	4	22	$845.8M	—
CHEYENNE	—	74	85	$842.8M	Cooling-93%
WALNUT	NY, USA	53	83	$842.1M	—
Morrisville	—	24	118	$841.0M	Rising+36%
Brea	—	3	6	$829.8M	—
Bellevue	WA, USA	37	92	$829.6M	Cooling-56%
SAO PAULO	—	29	48	$824.6M	Cooling-100%
Kent	Kent, United Kingdom	8	8	$823.8M	Cooling-100%
NORWALK	—	56	120	$823.3M	Cooling-100%
PARMA	—	3	4	$822.9M	—
Arlington	—	28	83	$815.3M	Cooling-100%
Hayward	CA, USA; Remote	14	51	$814.7M	Cooling-100%
WARREN	—	20	24	$812.1M	New
SAINT LOUIS	—	50	117	$810.8M	Cooling-100%
Commerce	—	5	13	$810.4M	—
COSTA MESA	—	58	129	$806.6M	Cooling-89%
CLEARWATER	—	40	101	$801.8M	Cooling-38%
TALLINN	Harju County, Estonia; New York, NY, USA; London, England, United Kingdom; Barcelona, CT, Spain	11	11	$796.5M	—
MARLBOROUGH	—	43	121	$796.4M	Cooling-35%
WESTLAKE	—	20	31	$794.3M	Cooling-100%
GEORGE TOWN	—	25	31	$792.0M	Cooling-98%
Vienna	Vienna, Austria; Remote	100	32	$792.0M	Rising+117%
PLYMOUTH	MI, USA	76	162	$789.4M	Steady+19%
LAGUNA HILLS	—	43	113	$787.5M	Cooling-82%
RIO VISTA	—	5	5	$783.5M	—
TEL AVIV	CA, USA	37	72	$781.5M	Cooling-20%
MELBOURNE	—	40	65	$780.5M	New
Reston	—	23	57	$778.3M	Cooling-100%
GAINESVILLE	—	60	105	$777.6M	Cooling-92%
SANTA ROSA	—	50	84	$769.5M	Cooling-98%
SOLANA BEACH	CA, USA	54	113	$764.6M	Steady+3%
VALENCIA	—	22	59	$762.4M	Cooling-100%
SAN CLEMENTE	CA, USA	44	89	$759.8M	Rising+377%
LIVERMORE	—	26	55	$757.1M	Cooling-100%
Huntington Beach	—	8	25	$756.7M	Cooling-100%
GLENDALE	—	68	97	$752.8M	Cooling-54%
TOKYO	—	18	18	$751.2M	Rising+4748%
Greenwich	Greenwich, United Kingdom	13	25	$746.2M	Rising+59%
EVANSTON	LA, Nigeria; LA, Nigeria	45	88	$741.1M	Cooling-93%
CONCORD	—	83	141	$734.4M	Cooling-96%
Cheyenne	—	7	10	$730.6M	Cooling-39%
KING OF PRUSSIA	—	102	143	$726.4M	Cooling-58%
CORONA	—	18	21	$724.7M	Cooling-100%
SAVANNAH	—	22	27	$722.9M	Cooling-100%
Frisco	—	15	25	$721.8M	Cooling-100%
PROVO	—	74	129	$720.7M	Cooling-100%
SARATOGA	—	31	57	$715.3M	Rising+935%
DRAPER	CA, USA	55	96	$715.2M	Cooling-72%
REGINA	—	4	5	$713.8M	Cooling-100%
GOLDEN	—	49	139	$709.6M	Cooling-38%
CHESTERBROOK	—	4	4	$703.1M	Rising+530%
LANHAM	—	5	8	$703.1M	—
WALNUT CREEK	CA, USA	52	85	$702.2M	Cooling-100%
LOS GATOS	—	78	150	$702.0M	Cooling-89%
Chesterfield	Chesterfield, United Kingdom	9	8	$701.8M	—
NORTH SYDNEY	—	3	3	$701.8M	Cooling-100%
LONGMONT	—	57	132	$690.8M	Cooling-94%
AGOURA HILLS	—	27	44	$682.6M	Cooling-45%
Portland	OR, USA; Remote	72	120	$681.6M	Cooling-54%